Updated Resources for Munda Gold Deposit
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
Munda Gold Deposit
Updated Mineral Resources
Precursor to Starter Pit Mining
Highlights
•
Current estimates of resources are pit-constrained to reflect reasonable
prospects for eventual economic extraction.
•
Munda Gold Deposit resources (Indicated and Inferred) re-estimated at 3.65Mt
at 1.23g/t at a 0.5g/t cut-off for 145,000 oz Au.
•
Estimates incorporate new data from 10m x 10m spaced drilling over a shallow
portion of the deposit.
•
Resource model being used to optimise a starter pit mining near surface gold
mineralisation.
Management Comment
Mr. Mark English, Managing Director:
“We have steadily progressed our understanding of the Munda gold deposit with
infill drilling and this resource update as part of that progression. We’re pushing hard
to start mining a starter pit early in 2025”
Mr. John Utley, Technical Director:
“The 10m x 10m drill program reaffirmed the style of gold mineralisation at Munda,
notably very high grades against a background of much lower grades. It is prudent
to take a conservative approach to the contribution of the high grades to the
mineable grades at Munda in our planning for a starter pit such that any variations
should be on the upside”
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
The Announcement
Auric Mining Limited (ASX: AWJ) (Auric or the Company) is pleased to announce an
updated estimate of gold resources for the Munda gold deposit.
Matrix Resource Consultants Pty Ltd (“Matrix”) have completed a new estimate of
Mineral Resources for the Munda gold deposit as a precursor to defining an Ore
Reserve for a trial pit. To provide estimates with reasonable prospects of eventual
economic extraction, Mineral Resources are reported within an optimal pit shell
generated at a gold price of $AUD3,200/oz.
Mineral Resource estimates at a range of gold cut-off grades are presented in Table
1. The figures are rounded to reflect the precision of the estimates and include
rounding errors.
Table 1 November 2024 Munda gold deposit Mineral Resource estimates
Au g/t
Cut-off
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
MTonnes
7.56
5.51
4.24
3.35
2.71
2.24
1.89
1.62
1.41
Indicated
Au g/t
0.72
0.89
1.06
1.22
1.38
1.53
1.67
1.81
1.94
Koz
175
158
144
131
120
110
101
94
88
MTonnes
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
Inferred
Au g/t
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.0
2.1
Koz
14
13
12
14
10
11
12
6
7
Indicated + Inferred
MTonnes Au g/t Koz
8.06
0.73
189
5.91
0.90
171
4.54
1.07
156
3.65
1.23
145
2.91
1.39
130
2.44
1.54
121
2.09
1.69
114
1.72
1.82
101
1.51
1.95
95
Since the previous estimate, described in an ASX announcement on 28 January
2022. Auric has completed a close-spaced drill program on a 10m x 10m pattern
over a shallow portion of the Munda gold deposit. That information and
conservative treatment of outlier assay grades has resulted in a slight reduction in
estimated grade relative to previous Mineral Resources. The reporting of resources
within an optimal pit shell reduces the tonnes compared with the earlier estimate.
For comparison, Table 2 presents the January 2022 Mineral Resource estimates. The
figures in this table are also rounded to reflect the precision of the estimates and
include rounding errors.
Table 2. January 2022 Munda gold deposit Mineral Resource estimates
Au g/t
Cut-off
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.80
1.00
Indicated
MTonnes Au g/t
8.928
0.75
6.113
0.98
4.598
1.19
3.684
1.38
3.052
1.55
2.240
1.86
1.737
2.14
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Koz
215.3
193.0
176.3
163.1
152.0
133.9
119.4
Inferred
MTonnes Au g/t
2.807
0.61
1.597
0.88
1.070
1.15
0.797
1.39
0.633
1.61
0.450
1.98
0.353
2.28
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
Koz
54.7
45.4
39.5
35.6
32.7
28.7
25.9
Indicated + Inferred
MTonnes Au g/t Koz
11.735
0.72
270.0
7.710
0.96
238.4
5.668
1.18
215.8
4.481
1.38
198.7
3.685
1.56
184.7
2.690
1.88
162.6
2.090
2.16
145.3
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
Information Material to the Estimates of Mineral Resources
Munda Summary
The Munda Gold Project is situated on mining lease M15/87, approximately 5km west
of Widgiemooltha and is linked to the Coolgardie-Esperance Highway by
miscellaneous licence L15/414.
There have been numerous phases of exploration and resource drilling at Munda
since the 1960’s. The majority of this work was undertaken by Western Mining
Corporation with subsequent programs by seven different companies including
excavation of a small pit by Resolute Mining in 1999. The most recent drilling was by
Auric with 55 deeper RC holes drilled in 2021-22 followed by 361 shallow infill holes
drilled on a 10m x 10m pattern in 2023-24 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Munda drilling relative to resource pit crest with resource drill holes referenced by
exploration company and hole type.
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
Mineral Resources are reported within an optimised pit shell generated by Matrix
from parameters supplied by Auric. This approach is appropriate for providing
estimates with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction in
accordance with JORC 2012 guidelines.
The optimal pit shell (resource pit) extends over around 650m of strike with a
maximum width of 300m and reaches a maximum depth of around 150m (Figures 2
and 3).
Cross sectional views of drill hole grades and estimated panel grades relative to the
resource pit are shown in Figures 2 and 3.
Figure 2. Cross section 360390mE – Showing drill hole grade ranges and estimated panel
grades relative to resource pit shell. Panels scaled by proportion above 0.50 g/t cut off and
coloured by the grade above that cut-off.
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
Figure 3. Cross section 360470mE – Showing drill hole grade ranges and estimated panel
grades relative to resource pit shell. Panels scaled by proportion above 0.50 g/t cut off and
coloured by the grade above that cut-off.
Geology and Geological Interpretation
The Munda gold deposit is hosted predominantly within basalts and to a lesser
extent in overlying ultramafic flows. Gold mineralisation, even at very high grades is
quite inconspicuous in hand specimen, with subtle albite and quartz alteration and
only rare sulphide minerals except where nickel mineralisation is present. The
distribution of gold mineralisation is interpreted to be controlled by the intersection
of a south-easterly dipping fault or shear and layering in the basalts and ultramafics
subparallel to the basalt-ultramafic contact.
Drilling Database
The drilling database informing the estimates comprises information from drilling
completed by previous tenement holders between 1967 and 2024 including
Anaconda, WMC, Resolute, Estrella, Titan, Widgie Nickel and Auric Mining. WMC's
RC and diamond drilling provides the largest proportion of this drilling (Table 3).
Resource drilling tests the currently defined Munda mineralisation over around 940m
of east west strike to around 45m depth but is particularly sparse below
approximately 230m depth below natural surface.
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
Table 3. Drill hole database compiled by company and hole type
Group
Phase
Resource
Anaconda 1967-75
WMC 1995-99
Resolute 1999-2000
Eureka 2016
Estrella 2019
Titan 2005-06
Widgie Nickel 2021-23
Auric 2021-22
Subtotal
Central
Southern
Subtotal
Total
Infill
(Auric 202324)
Subtotal
Auric
Total
1
Number
241
35
15
36
16
55
398
355
6
361
416
759
RC
Metres
21,811.0
1,893.0
1,177.0
4,125.0
2,939.0
6,780.0
38,725.0
11,156.0
145.0
11,301.0
18,081.0
50,026.0
Diamond1
Number Metres
41
5,825.3
57
10,921.2
2
243.9
2
321.3
26
6,917.8
16
6,001.4
144
30,230.9
144
30,230.9
Total
Number Metres
41
5,825.3
298
32,732.2
37
2,136.9
15
1,177.0
2
321.3
62
11,042.8
32
8,940.4
55
6,780.0
542
68,955.9
355
11,156.0
6
145.0
361
11,301.0
416
18,081.0
903
80,256.9
Widgie Nickel diamond drilling includes RC pre-collars.
From that database, the resource modelling utilised a mineralised domain
interpreted by Matrix which captures two metre down-hole composites from RC and
diamond drilling with gold grades of generally greater than 0.1 g/t. WMC drill holes
contributed around 40% of the dataset informing resources while Titan and Auric drill
holes contributed around 11% and 41% respectively. The estimation dataset is
dominated by samples from RC drilling with diamond drilling contributing around
8%.
Sampling and Sub-sampling Techniques
No details of sampling techniques are available for Anaconda’s diamond drilling or
WMC’s RC drilling. Sampling and assaying of the other significant drilling phases
employed industry standard methods, as follows:
A small proportion of the core drilled by WMC is in storage and accessible. The core
is NQ in diameter, has been sampled over nominally 1m intervals and has been sawn
with mostly half core removed. Sample intervals are generally well marked.
For Resolute’s drilling, RC and diamond core samples were generally collected over
1m down-hole intervals by riffle-splitting, or halving with a diamond saw respectively
and submitted to Kal Assay Laboratory for gold analysis by aqua regia digest with
AAS determination.
For Titan’s drilling, 1m riffle split RC samples were submitted for analysis as individual
samples or 4 m down-hole composites, and half or quarter core samples were
collected over generally 1 m intervals. The samples were assayed by ALS or
Genalysis for gold by fire assay.
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
Estrella drilled two HQ diameter diamond holes. Holes were sampled over nominal
1m lengths with half or quarter, generally sawn core submitted for assay.
Auric sampled RC holes at 1m intervals via a rig-mounted cyclone and fixed-cone
splitter. The individual samples, typically weighing between 2.5kg and 3.5kg were
submitted for assay.
Sample Analysis Methods
The assay methodology used by WMC is not recorded. Resolute and Estrella sample
aliquots of 25g or 50g were assayed via an aqua regia digest with gold
concentrations determined by AAS or ICP-MS. Titan and Auric utilised a 50g fire
assay with gold concentrations for Titan and Auric samples determined by ICP-OES
or ICP_AES.
QA Procedures and QC Data
Prior to Auric’s infill drilling program, approximately half (57%) of the sample intervals
represented in the resource database had no associated qualifying data, that is, no
record of QA procedures or QC data. The remainder have at least some associated
QC data; duplicate assaying and/or sample standards.
There is a significant spatial overlap between the data which have qualifying
information and those that do not. Based on analysis of the univariate and spatial
statistical properties of the qualified and unqualified data, it is considered
reasonable to use the combined qualified and unqualified drill hole data to
generate qualified estimates of Mineral Resources.
Resource Modelling
Munda gold Mineral Resources were estimated by Multiple Indicator Kriging (“MIK”)
with block support correction to reflect open pit mining selectivity, a method that
has been demonstrated to provide reliable estimates of resources recoverable by
open pit mining for a wide range of mineralisation styles.
The estimates are based on 2 m down-hole composited gold assay grades from RC
and diamond drilling by Auric and previous tenement holders, including 10 by 10 m
infill drilling undertaken by Auric. Mineral Resources are primarily informed by
information from RC drilling with diamond providing around 8% of mineralised
domain composites within the pit shell constraining Mineral Resources.
Micromine software was used for data compilation, domain wire framing and
coding of composite values and GS3M was used for resource estimation. The
resulting estimates were imported into Micromine for pit optimisation and resource
reporting. The estimation methodology is appropriate for the mineralisation style.
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
The MIK modelling utilised a northerly dipping mineralised domain capturing
composites with gold grades of greater than 0.1 g/t which extends over around 940
m of strike with an average horizontal width of around 120 m. Wire-framed surfaces
representing the base of oxidation and top of fresh rock and contact between
ultramafic and mafic rocks interpreted by Auric geologists from drill hole logging
were used for density assignment. Within the mineralised area, the base of complete
oxidation averages around 4 m depth with fresh rock occurring at an average
depth of around 16 m.
Grade continuity was characterised by indicator variograms modelled at 14
indicator thresholds. The modelled variograms are consistent with geological
interpretations and trends shown by composite gold grades. For estimation, search
ellipsoids and variograms were aligned with local mineralisation trends defined by
three zones of consistent orientation. Class grades used for MIK modelling were
derived from class mean grades with the exception of the upper bin grades which,
for the mineralised domain were determined by oxidation zone and selected from
either the bin median (oxide zone) or bin mean excluding small number of outlier
composites (transitional and fresh zones).
Bulk densities of 2.20 and 2.50 t/bcm were assigned to oxidised and transitional zones
respectively, with densities of 2.93 and 2.83 t/bcm allocated to fresh mafic and
ultramafic respectively. The densities assigned to transitional and fresh material
reflect immersion density measurements of diamond core. The density assigned to
oxidised mineralisation, which provides around 0.6% of Mineral Resources is
consistent with Matrix’s experience of similar mineralisation.
The estimates include a variance adjustment to give estimates of recoverable
resources above gold cut-off grades for open pit mining selectivity of around 5 by 5
by 2.5 m. In Matrix’s experience, the Mineral Resource estimates can be reasonably
expected to provide appropriately reliable estimates of potential mining outcomes
at the assumed selectivity without application of additional mining dilution or mining
recovery factors.
Mineral Resource Classification
Estimates for mineralisation tested by drilling spaced at around 20 m and closer are
classified as Indicated. Estimates for more broadly sampled mineralisation,
extrapolated up to generally around 30 m from general drilling areas are classified
as Inferred.
To provide estimates with reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction,
Mineral Resources are reported within an optimal pit shell generated at a gold price
of $AUD3,200/oz which extends over around 650 m of strike to a maximum depth of
around 150 m.
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
Cut-off Grades
Gold mineralisation at Munda is widely disseminated with higher-grade pockets
within a broad halo of lower grade mineralisation. This style is most appropriate to
potential development via open pit mining.
The resources have been estimated for a range of cut-off grades (Table 1) which
are considered appropriate in terms of the ‘reasonable prospects of eventual
economic extraction’ criterion for JORC 2012 compliance.
Mining and Metallurgical Factors
A model for the base of oxidation and top of fresh rock was developed utilising the
resource drill holes where appropriate data was available and validated using the
10m x 10m infill drill holes. This was used in the subdivision of the data into oxidised,
transitional and fresh rock subdomains for the current estimate of resources.
Bottle roll testwork on samples by Titan in 2006, and by Auric in 2020 returned
average recoveries of 96.5% and 92% respectively. A fresh rock composite sample
submitted by Auric in 2022 for gravity separation and cyanide leaching reported
gold extraction of 96.6% after 24 hours. Recent testwork on both oxide/transitional
and fresh rock composites representing the principal lithologies identified a
refractory gold component in fresh mafics with recoveries ranging from 82.1% under
standard cyanide concentrations to 96.8%. Follow-up intense cyanide leaching
(LeachWELL method) of 26 fresh mafic samples including the samples used to make
up the metallurgical testwork samples provided recoveries ranging from 79.8% to
97.4% and averaged 92.0%. Whist encouraging, the overall recovery will be best
determined via a starter pit.
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENTS
The information in this announcement that relates to information informing Mineral
Resources is based on and fairly represents information and supporting
documentation compiled by Mr John Utley, who is a full-time employee of Auric
Mining Limited. Mr Utley is a Competent Person and a member of the Australian
Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Utley has sufficient experience that is relevant to the
style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity
being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition
of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and
Ore Reserves’. Mr Utley consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based
on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
The information in this announcement that relates to Mineral Resource estimation is
based on information compiled by Mr Jonathon Abbott, who is a Member of The
Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Abbott is a director of Matrix Resource
Consultants Pty Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he
is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of
the “Australasian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves”. Mr Abbott consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on
his information in the form and context in which it appears.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Announcement may contain forward-looking statements which are identified
by words such as ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘should’, ‘believes’, ‘estimates’, ‘targets’,
‘expecting’, or ‘intends’ and other similar words that involve risks and uncertainties.
These statements are based on an assessment of present economic and operating
conditions, and on a number of assumptions regarding future events and actions
that, as at the date of this Announcement, are considered reasonable. Such
forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other important factors,
many of which are beyond the control of the Company, the Directors, and the
management. The Directors cannot and do not give any assurance that the results,
performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements contained in this Announcement will actually occur and investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
This announcement has been approved for release by the Board of Auric Mining Ltd.
Corporate Enquiries
Investor Relations
Mark English
Managing Director
Auric Mining Limited
Alex Cowie
Director
NWR Communications
T +61 409 372 775
E menglish@auricmining.com.au
T +61 412 952 610
E alexc@nwrcommunications.com.au
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
Follow our
communications
Click here to
subscribe to our
updates
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
Appendix A Munda JORC Table 1 checklist
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections)
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
• Nature and quality of sampling
(eg cut channels, random
chips, or specific specialised
industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation,
such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These
examples should not be taken
as limiting the broad meaning
of sampling.
• Include reference to measures
taken to ensure sample
representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems
used.
• Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material
to the Public Report.
• In cases where ‘industry
standard’ work has been done
this would be relatively simple
(eg ‘reverse circulation drilling
was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was
pulverised to produce a 30 g
charge for fire assay’). In other
cases, more explanation may
be required, such as where
there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
• There are 903 drill holes in the Munda
resource database comprising 759
RC holes and 144 diamond drill holes
for 80,257m, including 361 infill RC
holes for 11,156m drilled on a 10m x
10m pattern in 2023-24. Most of the
holes relevant to resource estimation
were drilled between 1995 and 2024
but with some resampling by WMC in
1995 of earlier diamond drill core. The
resultant drill pattern is a nominal 20m
x 20m pattern in central, shallow
portions of the deposit to
considerably broader in peripheral
areas and at depth. The holes were
drilled by the following companies, in
sequence from earliest to most
recent:
• Anaconda 1967-1975 – Diamond drill
holes where gold was assayed, were
sampled at intervals of between
0.15m and 3m, averaging 1m. There
are no records as to core sampling
techniques including what portion of
core was submitted for assay and
how split.
• Western Mining Corp – 1995-1999; RC
holes were sampled at 1m intervals there are no records as to RC
sampling techniques. Diamond drill
holes were continuously sampled at
1m or shorter intervals – there are no
records as to core sampling
techniques including what portion of
core was submitted for assay and
how split.
• Resolute Mining – 1999-2000; RC
samples were collected via a
cyclone at 1m intervals and riffle split
to 2-3kg subsamples for lab
submission. Diamond core was NQ2
diameter and was half cored using a
diamond saw with 1m sample lengths
predominant but selective sampling
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
10 DECEMBER 2024
from 0.2m to 1.2m lengths
• Titan Resources – 2005-2006; RC
samples were collected at 1m
intervals via a cyclone and riffle split
75:25. Composite 4m samples were
speared and 1m splits were submitted
to the lab at the geologist’s
discretion. Any composites returning
>0.3g/t were resampled at 1m
intervals. Diamond core was cut and
half core or quarter core submitted
for assay. Core sample lengths were
predominantly 1m but ranged from
0.1m to 1.6m
• Consolidated Nickel – 2006-2007; A
single diamond hole was drilled with
1m samples submitted for assay. The
Titan Resources sampling procedures
appear to have been utilized.
• Estrella – 2019; Two diamond holes
drilled, both in HQ diameter. Sample
lengths predominantly 1m length but
ranged from 0.25m to 3m (in zone of
poor recovery). Core split when
highly weathered and cut when
firmer – quarter and half core
samples submitted to lab.
• Auric Mining – 2021; 39 RC holes (55
RC holes in broader Munda area). RC
samples collected at 1m intervals via
a cyclone and riffle splitter and 2.53kg sample submitted to laboratory
Drilling
techniques
Drill sample
recovery
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
• Drill type (eg core, reverse
circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails,
face-sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if
so, by what method, etc).
• Method of recording and
assessing core and chip sample
recoveries and results assessed.
• Measures taken to maximize
sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the
samples.
• Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
• All RC drilling by face-sampling
hammer. Core diameter where
recorded was NQ or HQ. Titan
Resources and Estrella oriented drill
core but orientation tool not
specified. There is no record by earlier
companies if core oriented
• No records remain for core and chip
sample recoveries prior to Estrella’s
2019 diamond drill holes. Core
recoveries for the two Estrella drill
holes averaged 91%
• Auric RC samples weighed at
laboratory and weights reported.
Duplicate samples taken after every
15 samples and weights also reported
• There is no relationship between
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
Logging
•
•
•
Subsampling
techniques
and
sample
preparatio
n
•
•
•
•
•
•
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
•
•
Auric Mining Limited
ACN 635 470 843
bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Whether core and chip
samples have been
geologically and
geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative
or quantitative in nature. Core
(or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
The total length and
percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.
If core, whether cut or sawn
and whether quarter, half or all
core taken.
If non-core, whether riffled,
tube sampled, rotary split, etc
and whether sampled wet or
dry.
For all sample types, the nature,
quality and appropriateness of
the sample preparation
technique.
Quality control procedures
adopted for all sub-sampling
stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that
the sampling is representative
of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
Whether sample sizes are
appropriate to the grain size of
the material being sampled.
The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the assaying
and laboratory procedures
used and whether the
technique is considered partial
or total.
For geophysical tools,
spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the
Level 1, 1 Tully Road, East Perth WA 6004
PO Box 1057, Joondalup DC WA 6919
10 DECEMBER 2024
sample recovery and grade and no
sample bias
• All core and chips were geologically
logged. Only rock type is captured in
the database for holes drilled till 2000.
More detailed features are captured
from 2006 – this is sufficient to support
mineral resource estimation.
• Geotechnical logging is
acknowledged in reports but no
geotechnical logs have been
located. Geotechnical drilling to
determine pit wall parameters is
required
• There is no record of sub-sampling
techniques for drilling prior to 1999.
• From 1999, RC samples were reduced
to 2-3kg subsamples using a riffle
splitter or, spear sampling where 4m
composites were taken. Those
composite samples that returned
significant assays were resampled at
1m intervals using a riffle splitter
• From 1999, diamond core was sawn
except where very weathered when
core was split. Half or quarter core
was submitted for assay.
• Auric submitted duplicate samples at
ratio 1 in 15 samples. These 242
sample duplicates showed a
sampling precision of +/-30% which is
reasonable for RC sampling
• Western Mining Corp – 1995-1998;
There is no record as to assay method
or the lab used.
• Resolute Mining – 1999-2000; RC and
diamond sample were assayed by
aqua regia digest and AAS finish at
Kal Assay Laboratory in Kalgoorlie.
Duplicate assays were reported.
• Titan Resources – 2005-2006; RC and
info@auricmining.com.au
08 9548 9997
auricmining.com.au
ASX: AWJ
ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE
parameters used in determining
the analysis including
instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control
procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory che
Share your feedback
Discover